本文共 15491 字,大约阅读时间需要 51 分钟。
上一家公司有搞股票,当时很任性地直接从服务器读取一个股票10年份的股价(还有各种指标)在客户端的图表上显示,而且因为是桌面客户端,传输的数据也是简单粗暴地使用Soap序列化。获取报价的接口大概如下,通过symbol、beginDate和endDate三个参数获取股票某个时间段的股价:
public IEnumerableLoadStockPrices(string symbol,DateTime beginDate,DateTime endDate){ //some code}
后来用Xamarin.Forms做了移动客户端,在手机上就不敢这么任性了,移动端不仅对流量比较敏感,而且显示这么多数据也不现实,于是限制为不可以获取这么长时间的股价,选择一种新的序列化方式也被提上了日程。不过当时我也快离职了所以没关心这件事。
上周看到这篇问文章:,一时兴起就试试用各种常用的序列化技术实现以前的需求。[Serializable][ProtoContract][DataContract]public class StockPrice{ [ProtoMember(1)] [DataMember] public double ClosePrice { get; set; } [ProtoMember(2)] [DataMember] public DateTime Date { get; set; } [ProtoMember(3)] [DataMember] public double HighPrice { get; set; } [ProtoMember(4)] [DataMember] public double LowPrice { get; set; } [ProtoMember(5)] [DataMember] public double OpenPrice { get; set; } [ProtoMember(6)] [DataMember] public double PrvClosePrice { get; set; } [ProtoMember(7)] [DataMember] public string Symbol { get; set; } [ProtoMember(8)] [DataMember] public double Turnover { get; set; } [ProtoMember(9)] [DataMember] public double Volume { get; set; }}
上面是股价的数据结构,包含股票代号、日期、OHLC、前收市价(PreClosePice),成交额(Turnover)和成交量(Volume),这里我已经把序列化要用到的Attribute加上了。
测试数据使用長和(00001)2003年开始10年的股价,共2717条数据。为了方便测试已经把它们从数据库导出到文本文档。其实大小也就200K而已。
在.NET中要执行序列化有很多可以考虑的东西,如网络传输、安全性、.NET Remoting的远程对象等内容。但这里单纯只考虑序列化本身。
二进制序列化将对象的公共字段和私有字段以及类(包括含有该类的程序集)的名称都转换成字节流,对该对象进行反序列化时,将创建原始对象的准确克隆。除了.NET可序列化的类型,其它类型要想序列化,最简单的方法是使用 SerializableAttribute 对其进行标记。
.NET中使用BinaryFormatter实现二进制序列化,代码如下:
public override byte[] Serialize(Listinstance){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream()) { IFormatter formatter = new BinaryFormatter(); formatter.Serialize(stream, instance); return stream.ToArray(); }}public override List Deserialize(byte[] source){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream(source)) { IFormatter formatter = new BinaryFormatter(); var target = formatter.Deserialize(stream); return target as List ; }}
结果:
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes |
---|---|---|---|
BinarySerializer | 117 | 12 | 242,460 |
XML序列化将对象的公共字段和属性或者方法的参数及返回值转换(序列化)为符合特定 XML架构定义语言 (XSD) 文档的 XML 流。由于 XML 是开放式的标准,因此可以根据需要由任何应用程序处理 XML流,而与平台无关。
.NET中执行Xml序列化可以使用XmlSerializer:
public override byte[] Serialize(Listinstance){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream()) { var serializer = new System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer(typeof(List )); serializer.Serialize(stream, instance); return stream.ToArray(); }}public override List Deserialize(byte[] source){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream(source)) { var serializer = new System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer(typeof(List )); var target = serializer.Deserialize(stream); return target as List ; }}
结果如下,因为XML格式为了有较好的可读性引入了一些冗余的文本信息,所以体积膨胀了不少:
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes |
---|---|---|---|
XmlSerializer | 133 | 26 | 922,900 |
XML 序列化还可用于将对象序列化为符合 SOAP 规范的 XML 流。 SOAP 是一种基于 XML 的协议,它是专门为使用 XML 来传输过程调用而设计的,熟悉WCF的应该不会对SOAP感到陌生。
.NET中使用SoapFormatter实现序列化,代码如下:
public override byte[] Serialize(Listinstance){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream()) { IFormatter formatter = new SoapFormatter(); formatter.Serialize(stream, instance.ToArray()); return stream.ToArray(); }}public override List Deserialize(byte[] source){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream(source)) { IFormatter formatter = new SoapFormatter(); var target = formatter.Deserialize(stream); return (target as StockPrice[]).ToList(); }}
结果如下,由于它本身的特性,体积膨胀得更可怕了(我记得WCF默认就是使用SOAP?):
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes |
---|---|---|---|
SoapSerializer | 105 | 123 | 2,858,416 |
JSON(JavaScript Object Notation)是一种由道格拉斯·克罗克福特构想和设计、轻量级的资料交换语言,该语言以易于让人阅读的文字为基础,用来传输由属性值或者序列性的值组成的数据对象。
虽然.NET提供了DataContractJsonSerializer,但Json.NET更受欢迎,代码如下:
public override byte[] Serialize(Listinstance){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream()) { var serializer = new DataContractJsonSerializer(typeof(List )); serializer.WriteObject(stream, instance); return stream.ToArray(); }}public override List Deserialize(byte[] source){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream(source)) { var serializer = new DataContractJsonSerializer(typeof(List )); var target = serializer.ReadObject(stream); return target as List ; }}
结果如下,JSON的体积比XML小很多:
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes |
---|---|---|---|
JsonSerializer | 40 | 60 | 504,320 |
其实一开始我和我的同事就清楚用Protobuf最好。
Protocol Buffers 是 Google提供的数据序列化机制。它性能高,压缩效率好,但是为了提高性能,Protobuf采用了二进制格式进行编码,导致可读性较差。
使用protobuf-net需要将序列化的对象使用ProtoContractAttribute和ProtoMemberAttribute进行标记。序列化和反序列化代码如下:
public override byte[] Serialize(Listinstance){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream()) { Serializer.Serialize(stream, instance); return stream.ToArray(); }}public override List Deserialize(byte[] source){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream(source)) { return Serializer.Deserialize
>(stream); }}
结果十分优秀:
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes |
---|---|---|---|
ProtobufSerializer | 93 | 18 | 211,926 |
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes |
---|---|---|---|
BinarySerializer | 117 | 12 | 242,460 |
XmlSerializer | 133 | 26 | 922,900 |
SoapSerializer | 105 | 123 | 2,858,416 |
JsonSerializer | 40 | 60 | 504,320 |
ProtobufSerializer | 93 | 18 | 211,926 |
将上述方案的结果列出来对比,Protobuf序列化后体积最少。不过即使是Protobuf,压缩后的数据仍然比文本文档的200K还大,那还不如直接传输这个文本文档。
其实传输的数据结构上有很大的优化空间。
首先是股票代号Symbol,前面提到获取股价的接口大概是这样:IEnumerable LoadStockPrices(string symbol,DateTime beginDate,DateTime endDate)
。既然都知道要获取的股票代号,StockPrice中Symbol这个属性完全就是多余的。
其次是OHLC和PreClosePrice,港股(不记得其它Market是不是这样)的报价肯定是4位有效数字(如95.05和102.4),用float精度也够了,不必用 double。
最后是Date,反正只需要知道日期,不必知道时分秒,直接用与1970-01-01相差的天数作为存储应该就可以了。
private static DateTime _beginDate = new DateTime(1970, 1, 1);public DateTime Date{ get => _beginDate.AddDays(DaysFrom1970); set => DaysFrom1970 = (short) Math.Floor((value - _beginDate).TotalDays);}[ProtoMember(2)][DataMember]public short DaysFrom1970 { get; set; }
不要以为Volume可以改为int,有些仙股有时会有几十亿的成交量,超过int的最大值2147483647(顺便一提Int32的最大值是2的31次方减1,有时面试会考)。
这样修改后的类结构如下:
[Serializable][ProtoContract][DataContract]public class StockPriceSlim{ [ProtoMember(1)] [DataMember] public float ClosePrice { get; set; } private static DateTime _beginDate = new DateTime(1970, 1, 1); public DateTime Date { get => _beginDate.AddDays(DaysFrom1970); set => DaysFrom1970 = (short) Math.Floor((value - _beginDate).TotalDays); } [ProtoMember(2)] [DataMember] public short DaysFrom1970 { get; set; } [ProtoMember(3)] [DataMember] public float HighPrice { get; set; } [ProtoMember(4)] [DataMember] public float LowPrice { get; set; } [ProtoMember(5)] [DataMember] public float OpenPrice { get; set; } [ProtoMember(6)] [DataMember] public float PrvClosePrice { get; set; } [ProtoMember(8)] [DataMember] public double Turnover { get; set; } [ProtoMember(9)] [DataMember] public double Volume { get; set; }}
序列化的体积大幅减少:
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes |
---|---|---|---|
BinarySerializer | 11 | 12 | 141,930 |
XmlSerializer | 42 | 24 | 977,248 |
SoapSerializer | 48 | 89 | 2,586,720 |
JsonSerializer | 17 | 33 | 411,942 |
ProtobufSerializer | 7 | 3 | 130,416 |
其实之所以有这么大的优化空间,一来是因为传输的对象本身就是ORM生成的对象没针对网络传输做优化,二来各个券商的数据源差不多都是这样传输数据的,最后,本来这个接口是给桌面客户端用的根本就懒得考虑传输数据的大小。
由于股票的数据结构相对稳定,而且这个接口不需要通用性,可以自己实现序列化。StockPriceSlim所有属性加起来是38个字节,测试数据是2717条报价,共103246字节,少于Protobuf的130416字节。要达到每个报价只存储38个字节,只需将每个属性的值填入固定的位置:
public override byte[] SerializeSlim(Listinstance){ var list = new List (); foreach (var item in instance) { var bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(item.DaysFrom1970); list.AddRange(bytes); bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(item.OpenPrice); list.AddRange(bytes); bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(item.HighPrice); list.AddRange(bytes); bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(item.LowPrice); list.AddRange(bytes); bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(item.ClosePrice); list.AddRange(bytes); bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(item.PrvClosePrice); list.AddRange(bytes); bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(item.Volume); list.AddRange(bytes); bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(item.Turnover); list.AddRange(bytes); } return list.ToArray();}public override List DeserializeSlim(byte[] source){ var result = new List (); var index = 0; using (var stream = new MemoryStream(source)) { while (index < source.Length) { var price = new StockPriceSlim(); var bytes = new byte[sizeof(short)]; stream.Read(bytes, 0, sizeof(short)); var days = BitConverter.ToInt16(bytes, 0); price.DaysFrom1970 = days; index += bytes.Length; bytes = new byte[sizeof(float)]; stream.Read(bytes, 0, sizeof(float)); var value = BitConverter.ToSingle(bytes, 0); price.OpenPrice = value; index += bytes.Length; stream.Read(bytes, 0, sizeof(float)); value = BitConverter.ToSingle(bytes, 0); price.HighPrice = value; index += bytes.Length; stream.Read(bytes, 0, sizeof(float)); value = BitConverter.ToSingle(bytes, 0); price.LowPrice = value; index += bytes.Length; stream.Read(bytes, 0, sizeof(float)); value = BitConverter.ToSingle(bytes, 0); price.ClosePrice = value; index += bytes.Length; stream.Read(bytes, 0, sizeof(float)); value = BitConverter.ToSingle(bytes, 0); price.PrvClosePrice = value; index += bytes.Length; bytes = new byte[sizeof(double)]; stream.Read(bytes, 0, sizeof(double)); var volume = BitConverter.ToDouble(bytes, 0); price.Volume = volume; index += bytes.Length; bytes = new byte[sizeof(double)]; stream.Read(bytes, 0, sizeof(double)); var turnover = BitConverter.ToDouble(bytes, 0); price.Turnover = turnover; index += bytes.Length; result.Add(price); } return result; }}
结果如下:
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes |
---|---|---|---|
CustomSerializer | 5 | 1 | 103,246 |
这种方式不仅序列化后的体积最小,而且序列化和反序列化的速度都十分优秀,不过代码十分难看而且没有扩展性。尝试用反射改进一下:
public override byte[] SerializeSlim(Listinstance){ var result = new List (); foreach (var item in instance) foreach (var property in typeof(StockPriceSlim).GetProperties()) { if (property.GetCustomAttribute(typeof(DataMemberAttribute)) == null) continue; var value = property.GetValue(item); byte[] bytes = null; if (property.PropertyType == typeof(int)) bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes((int)value); else if (property.PropertyType == typeof(short)) bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes((short)value); else if (property.PropertyType == typeof(float)) bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes((float)value); else if (property.PropertyType == typeof(double)) bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes((double)value); result.AddRange(bytes); } return result.ToArray();}public override List DeserializeSlim(byte[] source){ using (var stream = new MemoryStream(source)) { var result = new List (); var index = 0; while (index < source.Length) { var price = new StockPriceSlim(); foreach (var property in typeof(StockPriceSlim).GetProperties()) { if (property.GetCustomAttribute(typeof(DataMemberAttribute)) == null) continue; byte[] bytes = null; object value = null; if (property.PropertyType == typeof(int)) { bytes = new byte[sizeof(int)]; stream.Read(bytes, 0, bytes.Length); value = BitConverter.ToInt32(bytes, 0); } else if (property.PropertyType == typeof(short)) { bytes = new byte[sizeof(short)]; stream.Read(bytes, 0, bytes.Length); value = BitConverter.ToInt16(bytes, 0); } else if (property.PropertyType == typeof(float)) { bytes = new byte[sizeof(float)]; stream.Read(bytes, 0, bytes.Length); value = BitConverter.ToSingle(bytes, 0); } else if (property.PropertyType == typeof(double)) { bytes = new byte[sizeof(double)]; stream.Read(bytes, 0, bytes.Length); value = BitConverter.ToDouble(bytes, 0); } property.SetValue(price, value); index += bytes.Length; } result.Add(price); } return result; }}
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes |
---|---|---|---|
ReflectionSerializer | 413 | 431 | 103,246 |
好像好了一些,但性能大幅下降。我好像记得有人说过.NET会将反射缓存让我不必担心反射带来的性能问题,看来我的理解有出入。索性自己缓存些反射结果:
private readonly IEnumerable_properties;public ExtendReflectionSerializer(){ _properties = typeof(StockPriceSlim).GetProperties().Where(p => p.GetCustomAttribute(typeof(DataMemberAttribute)) != null).ToList();}
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes |
---|---|---|---|
ExtendReflectionSerializer | 11 | 11 | 103,246 |
这样改进后性能还可以接受。
最后试试在序列化的基础上再随便压缩一下:
public byte[] SerializeWithZip(Listinstance){ var bytes = SerializeSlim(instance); using (var memoryStream = new MemoryStream()) { using (var deflateStream = new DeflateStream(memoryStream, CompressionLevel.Fastest)) { deflateStream.Write(bytes, 0, bytes.Length); } return memoryStream.ToArray(); }}public List DeserializeWithZip(byte[] source){ using (var originalFileStream = new MemoryStream(source)) { using (var memoryStream = new MemoryStream()) { using (var decompressionStream = new DeflateStream(originalFileStream, CompressionMode.Decompress)) { decompressionStream.CopyTo(memoryStream); } var bytes = memoryStream.ToArray(); return DeserializeSlim(bytes); } }}
结果看来不错:
Name | Serialize(ms) | Deserialize(ms) | Bytes | Serialize With Zip(ms) | Deserialize With Zip(ms) | Bytes With Zip |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BinarySerializer | 11 | 12 | 141,930 | 22 | 12 | 72,954 |
XmlSerializer | 42 | 24 | 977,248 | 24 | 28 | 108,839 |
SoapSerializer | 48 | 89 | 2,586,720 | 61 | 87 | 140,391 |
JsonSerializer | 17 | 33 | 411,942 | 24 | 35 | 90,125 |
ProtobufSerializer | 7 | 3 | 130,416 | 7 | 6 | 65,644 |
CustomSerializer | 5 | 1 | 103,246 | 9 | 3 | 57,697 |
ReflectionSerializer | 413 | 431 | 103,246 | 401 | 376 | 59,285 |
ExtendReflectionSerializer | 11 | 11 | 103,246 | 13 | 14 | 59,285 |
满足了好奇心,顺便复习了一下各种序列化的方式。
因为原来的需求就很单一,没有测试各种数据量下的对比。
虽然Protobuf十分优秀,但在本地存储序列化文件时为了可读性我通常都会选择XML或JSON。
转载地址:http://fxghx.baihongyu.com/